Connect with us

Editorial

Compassion bedaubed with politics

Published

on

Saturday 20th February, 2021

Congress Leader Rahul Gandhi says he has forgiven his father’s killers. He said so, the other day, in answer to a question during an interaction at the Bharathidasan Government College for Women, in Puducherry. He felt a great pain but not anger, he added. If he is telling us the truth, then he is too good to be in politics characterised by anger, rancour, animosity, greed, revenge and other such base instincts; he should be in an ashram, guiding others on their spiritual journeys, instead of seeking power and venting his spleen at his political rivals. How come a person who claims to be so compassionate as to forgive his father’s killers launches into tirades against Prime Minister Narendra Modi and others at the drop of a hat?

There is hardly anything that politicians do not politicise to gain political mileage. They do not spare even noble qualities such as compassion.

In 2016, the then President Maithripala Sirisena made a big show of what he made out to be his compassion; he granted a presidential pardon to a former Tiger who had conspired to kill him. It was obvious that he sought some political mileage out of that pretentious act of grace. Interestingly, he never forgave Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, who had enabled him to realise his presidential dream. He also made a determined bid to have his former political boss and his family members thrown behind bars, but in vain. It is said in politics that if you cannot beat them, you should join them. He did just that, later on. He is now in the exalted company of the Rajapaksas

“Any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind,” said John Donne. But it needs to be said that Rajiv Gandhi reaped what he had sown. All those who mollycoddled the LTTE suffered the same fate as the proverbial young lady of Niger, who rode on a tiger joyously but returned inside it. President Ranasinghe Premadasa also made that blunder. He gifted arms, ammunition, money, building materials, etc., to the Tigers, who had taken on the IPKF, only to be assassinated by the LTTE a few years later. Among those who made the same mistake were many Tamil political leaders who affectionately called the Tigers ‘our boys’.

Even the states that sponsor terrorism get into trouble just like political leaders however powerful they may be. The US created terrorism in Afghanistan to get rid of the Russians only to be hoist with its own petard when bin Laden turned his guns on it. The western powers bent on denigrating China would have the world believe that coronavirus was created in a laboratory and accidentally leaked. They themselves are guilty of having created an extremely dangerous virus as it were—terrorism, which continues to plague the world. But for them, most of the Global South would have been free from bloody conflicts, which have created a huge market for their weapons and are serving their geo-political interests.

What would have happened if the US, the UK, France and other European nations had succeeded in their endeavour to coerce Sri Lanka into sparing the LTTE leadership during the final battle in 2009? Terrorism would have survived, and crimes such as the forcible child conscription, political assassinations, extortion, massacres and bomb attacks on buses and trains would have continued during the last 12 years or so; thousands of lives would have been lost. The aforesaid countries owe an apology to Sri Lanka for having striven to perpetuate terrorism here. What moral right do those who harbour bloodthirsty terrorists and try to rescue them when they are about to get their comeuppance have to champion human rights? Curiously, they were silent when JVP terrorism was crushed to save democracy twice. Maybe, they did not care because the JVP does not have thousands of its backers in western capitals to raise funds and vote for politicians there.

Rahul’s memories of Prabhakaran and his father’s association with the LTTE must be vivid. K. Venkataramanan revealed in an article published in The Times of India, in the immediate aftermath of the conclusion of the Eelam War IV, that Rajiv, during his honeymoon with the LTTE, had got Rahul to bring his (Rajiv’s) bulletproof vest, and placed it on Prabhakaran, asking the latter to take care. Now that Rahul has publicly declared that he has forgiven his father’s killers, the question is whether the victims of the LTTE have forgiven his father, who was instrumental in creating Tiger terror here and inflicting untold suffering on Sri Lankans.

Rahul should also ask the families of more than one thousand Indian soldiers who died here, fighting the LTTE, whether they have forgiven the killers of their loved ones. Most of all, he should ask them whether they have forgiven his late father who sent them on a disastrous mission here to fight an enemy he had created. This question must also be posed to the current Indian leaders who have joined the US in the human rights witch-hunt in Geneva against those who neutralised the LTTE’s military muscle and, thereby, not only saved Sri Lankans but also enabled some Indian politicians who feared the Tigers to heave a sigh of relief and shuffle off their heavy bulletproof vests.


Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Editorial

Gesture of solidarity

Published

on

Thursday 25th February, 2021

Nothing could be more reassuring and uplifting in times of trouble than a true friend’s presence. Sri Lanka has only a few generous, altruistic friends, and Pakistan certainly is prominent among them. Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan’s visit, albeit brief, could not have come at a better time for Sri Lanka, a badger facing a pack of growling mastiffs in Geneva; what it needs most at this juncture is moral support.

Many are the nations that have proffered loads and loads of unsolicited advice to Sri Lanka on how to protect democracy and human rights. But none of them helped remove the scourge of terror, the gravest threat to democracy and humankind. Pakistan stood unwaveringly behind Sri Lanka during the latter’s war on terror and helped the latter in numerous ways. It was the multi-barrel rocket launchers Pakistan rushed here in the aftermath of the fall of Elephant Pass garrison, in 2000, that enabled the Army put the brakes on the ‘unceasing wave’ of the LTTE. Otherwise, the Tigers would have laid siege to Jaffna with ease, forcing the Army to withdraw its troops. (Some countries even offered ships for ferrying soldiers to Colombo!) Today, Sri Lanka is free from political assassinations, massacres, child conscription, etc., as LTTE terrorism has been neutralised. If it had given in to pressure from the Western bloc and spared the LTTE’s military muscle, thousands of lives would have been destroyed during the last 12 years or so.

There were calls, in some quarters, for PM Khan to take up the issue of ‘forced burials’ with Colombo. They were obviously aimed at creating a media feeding frenzy and thereby giving the anti-Sri Lankan campaign in Geneva a boost. Pakistan and Sri Lanka have their own way of sorting out problems; never do they resort to megaphone diplomacy. But, the fact remains that mandatory burials have hurt the Muslim community beyond measure mostly because those who die of COVID-19 are allowed to be buried in other countries including those notorious for their antipathy towards Muslims. Some prominent Sri Lankan medical experts are of the view that the burial of pandemic victims should be permitted, provided the health regulations in place to prevent the spread of the pandemic are strictly followed. Prime Minster Mahinda Rajapaksa, as a sensible leader, must have gone by expert opinion including that of the Sri Lanka Medical Association, when he said in Parliament recently that the burial of COVID-19 victims would become an option. Sadly, he was overruled.

It is significant that the Head of State of a prominent Islamic nation has been to Sri Lanka while the pro-LTTE groups are exerting a considerable pull on a section of the Muslims community who courageously stood up to LTTE terror and thwarted Prabhakaran’s efforts to extend his control over the Eastern Province. Some of the Muslims who became the target of a hate campaign following the Easter Sunday carnage have joined forces with the pro-LTTE political groups masquerading as crusaders for democracy, in the Eastern Province, which is of pivotal importance to the countries that seek to counter increasing Chinese presence here. This is something Sri Lanka and its Islamic allies such as Pakistan should take cognizance of.

Meanwhile, there are many areas where Sri Lanka and Pakistan can partner to realise their full potentials as developing nations. Besides trade, commerce and investment, they can concentrate more on agriculture, construction, science and technology, education, medicine, tourism, etc. PM Khan’s ‘Global Initiative on Debt Relief’ is something that Sri Lanka, as well as other nations in the Global South, should fully support.

There are some issues that Sri Lanka and Pakistan should address jointly. One of them is the narcotic trade, which has affected both countries badly. Drug cartels have established a supply route via Pakistan and Sri Lanka, which has become a narcotic transit point of sorts.

It is a pity that the Sri Lankan Parliament did not have the honour of being addressed by PM Khan, a brilliant orator and trusted friend.

Continue Reading

Editorial

Should SL follow UK?

Published

on

Wednesday 24th February, 2021

The Gash reports are in the news again. They are the diplomatic dispatches filed by Lt. Col. Anthony Gash, who was the Defence Attache of the British High Commission, Colombo, on the final stages of Sri Lanka’s war on terror. The UK, which leads the Sri Lanka Core Group in Geneva, has suppressed the Gash reports, whose revelations run counter to the claims, on which the war crimes resolution against Sri Lanka is based.

Surprisingly, Sri Lanka has not done enough to bring the Gash reports to the notice of the UNHRC. One should not be so naïve as to believe that facts will make either the so-called Core Group or UNHRC chief Michelle Bachelet change their minds. Their agenda is determined by the US, which uses human rights as a bludgeon to beat the nations that refuse to do its bidding. But placing the Gash reports before the UNHRC will help unmask the Core Group members and the US.

The UK is not alone in suppressing facts. The US, too, has chosen to ignore the facts that Lt. Col. Lawrence Smith, who was its Defence Attache in Colombo, during the final phases of the Vanni war, placed before an audience at an international defence seminar in Colombo in 2011; he disputed the claim that the Sri Lankan military had committed war crimes. He would not have said so without evidence to support his claim.

Old habits die hard. The UK and the US have a history of falsifying reports to suit their geo-strategic interests. They produced fake intelligence dossiers to justify the invasion of Iraq although the British intelligence had found no evidence of weapons of mass destruction in that country. They have adopted the same method in their war crimes campaign against Sri Lanka. Gash has said not more than 7,000 persons, including LTTE combatants, died in the war zone between 01 January and 18 May 2009. This number is in sharp contrast to the claim by the then UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon’s Panel of Experts that more than 40,000 people perished during the final phase of the war. None of the UN experts were here during the war, unlike Gash and Lawrence, but the UK and the US have chosen to ignore facts their military experts have furnished. Why should the UK and the US have defence attaches at all in their foreign missions if they do not take their military experts’ views seriously?

What Lord Naseby managed to secure in the UK was a redacted version of the Gash reports. The UK has got redacting reports related to wars down to a fine art. In 2016, it released the Chilcot report on the Iraqi war. What observers have found interesting about that inquiry is it took longer to conclude than the war. What was released after a protracted delay was a heavily redacted version of the report, but it contains enough evidence to prove that the then British Prime Minister Tony Blair, together with US President at that time George W. Bush waged an illegal war and, therefore, were responsible for war crimes.

Having taken upon itself the burden of protecting human rights and ensuring that crimes do not go unpunished in the developing world, the UK should set an example. Before levelling war crimes allegations against others and calling for action thereon, shouldn’t it bring Blair to justice for invading Iraq and causing deaths of millions of civilians, including more than 500,000 children, in an illegal war for oil?

Anything Westminster goes here. It is the considered opinion of the defenders of democracy that Sri Lanka should emulate the UK in protecting human rights. What if Sri Lanka takes a leaf out of the UK’s book in handling alleged war crimes? In November 2020, the British Parliament passed a bill to prevent ‘vexatious’ prosecutions of military personnel and veterans over war crimes allegations. This law seeks to grant the British military personnel, who have committed war crimes, an amnesty to all intents and purposes. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has ascertained evidence of a pattern of war crimes perpetrated by British soldiers against Iraqi detainees, some of whom were even raped and beaten to death. Curiously, the ICC said in December 2020, it would not take action against the perpetrators! Too big to be caught?

Continue Reading

Editorial

The rape of forests: Govt. in the dock

Published

on

Tuesday 23rd February, 2021

The government has apparently achieved what it set out to when it issued a gazette removing the peripheral forests from the purview of the Forest Department and placed them under the Divisional and District Secretariats, purportedly to promote traditional agriculture. Its supporters are encroaching on thousands of acres of forest land with absolute impunity. Nobody takes gazettes seriously, and the government is also not keen to deal with noncompliance; the declarations of maximum retail prices, and minimum purchasing prices are a case in point. They are flouted blatantly. But the gazette pertaining to the peripheral forests took effect immediately! Such is the high-octane performance on the part of the government when it wants to help its supporters.

We have argued, in this column, previously that the government entrusted the District and Divisional secretariats with the task of looking after parts of forests because administrators are scared of ruling party politicians and do the latter’s bidding. We reported, the other day, that a Divisional Secretary had accompanied a group of government supporters who grabbed land in the Somawathiya National Park. The public service is full of such servile officers, and what is in store for the country’s forests is not difficult to imagine.

President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, speaking at a Gama Samaga Pilisandarak event, last Saturday, faulted the Forest Department, the Wildlife Department, the environmental authorities and others for being involved in a tug of war, which, he said, had rendered the public confused and helpless. True, these institutions work in silos, and not all their personnel are honest and conscientious, but the real problem is not their rivalries; it is that public administrators are helping the ruling party backers grab forest land, and the government is doing nothing about it. If the government is really desirous of ensuring coordination among the state outfits responsible for protecting the environment, it should bring all of them under one umbrella, vest them with more powers and give teeth to the existing laws.

There are some sand deposits inside the Somawathiya sanctuary, according to environmentalists, and what prevents government politicians and their associates from exploiting them is the absence of a road. This is why some ruling party worthies are trying to pressure the Wildlife Department to permit cattle grazing inside the national park. When cattle and cowherds enter the forest, footpaths appear with the passage of time, and these tracks can be used by the politically-backed racketeers to access the sand deposits.

What is reported from the Somawathiya National Park is a textbook case of irony; perhaps, it also represents, in microcosm, the fate that befell the country after the successful conclusion of its war on terror. When the LTTE was around, nobody dared enter the national park for fear of terrorist attacks, and the place was safe, thanks to the absence of human activity. The present-day rulers liberated the area from the clutches of the LTTE more than a decade ago, but, unfortunately, the liberators are now supporting those who destroy the sanctuary.

The President has called for action against those who encroach on forests on the pretext of engaging in traditional agriculture. Defence Secretary General (retd) Kamal Gunaratne has said that he had found that some Divisional Secretaries were issuing licences to clear forest lands and the practice had to be stopped. We have published pictures of some land grabbers responsible for the rape of the Somawathiya sanctuary. They can be identified and hauled up before courts.

Now that both the President and the Defence Secretary are convinced that some errant state officials and encroachers responsible for destroying forests have to be stopped, the question is what prevents them from going the whole hog to have the racketeers brought to justice forthwith. For those who pride themselves on having killed Prabhakaran, stopping the destroyers of forests should be child’s play.

Continue Reading