Connect with us

Features

Sea of indecision strikes capacity enhancement

Published

on

Colombo Port

By Eng. D.GODAGE

(former Chief Engineer(Ports),
Managing Director SLPA and
Project Director – Colombo South Harbour Development Project
 
The shipping industry needs proper decisions as regards the functioning of the Port of Colombo. Those in the shipping industry, and others who wish the success of the Colombo Port have expressed concern over the delay in the commencement of operation of the East Container Terminal (ECT) of Colombo Port for nearly five years. The Chairman of Ceylon Association of Shipping Agents (CASA) has warned that Colombo hub status is sinking. He has emphasised the need to operationalise the East Container Terminal (ECT) of Colombo’s new South Harbour.

In February this year, a delegation of the German Industry and Commerce, in Colombo, said that Colombo Port needed further expansion to handle more container traffic.

The ECT issue was brought to public attention prior to the last general election, when three container handling cranes (costing over US$ 25 million) remained on the ship that had brought them to the port, as instructions had not been given for unloading them while Trade Union action by port employees against that inaction paralysed the port.

The cranes were unloaded onto the partly built ECT after discussions with the trade unions by the Prime Minister, prior to the parliamentary elections. The Prime Minister has appointed a committee to study and report. That report had been submitted to the Prime Minister.

When the construction of the ECT is completed, it will enhance Colombo container handling capacity by 2.4 million TEUs (container units). Current performance has been around 7.2 million TEUs. Unfortunately, due to failure of the previous government to take any pragmatic action over four years, under three ministers along the way, the partly built ECT idled, causing a massive financial loss to the Port. It is important to note that a minimum of two to three years will be needed to operationalise ECT from the date the green light is given to commence. Funds are needed to the tune of US$ 400 million.

The Colombo Port came into prominence as a result of container handling capacity enhancements and related infrastructure developments over the past four decades. Global ranking of ports is based on the annual container volumes handled by each port. It is known that Colombo ranked 138th position in 1980 and rose to 21st in 1997, after four berths of Jaya Container Terminal (JCT) was operational that resulted in handling 1.687 million TEUs. Colombo handled 7.05 million TEUs in all terminals in 2018 thereby reaching 24th global ranking, according to the Lloyds List. Volume handled in 2019 is recorded as 7.228 million TEUs. Though Corona pandemic slowed down the growth, yet 7 million TEUs at the end of 2020 is a possibility.

The handling volume growth trajectory has apparently not been affected much this year, and the container capacity expansion is urgent and critical. The Colombo South Harbor Business Plan 2005 envisaged that the whole ECT had to be operational by 2020 according to its traffic forecast. The National Port Master Plan, presented by the Ports Authority funded by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in March 2019, stated that capacity shortage had started from 2020. All known studies and expert opinion indicate that the Colombo Port is running out of container handling capacity, and prompt action to expand capacity is essential and critical.

 

Geographic location advantage vs competing ports

The distinct geographic advantage of the country provides the shortest and least cost deviation from the international navigation lanes for all main shipping lines. But that alone cannot be relied upon to remain as a leading hub; other factors like the timely enhancement of capacity, availability of modern equipment, efficient operation, elimination of port congestion, and ensuring shortest waiting time for ships, and competitive commercial tariff with simplified clearing process are also equally essential.

The delay in expanding the Colombo container handling capacity as indicated in plans is an incentive to tho competing ports in the region, posing a potential threat to Colombo. Newly developing Vizhinjam International Deepwater Multipurpose Seaport in Kerala, funded by the Adani Group, is reported to be coming into operation from December 2020 and has a capacity of 4 million TEUs. They say the Colombo Port will face stiffer competition thereafter and experience a loss in its share of cargo from India, which would set-in an economic setback for the country.

 

Past experience with delayed expansion

The Ports Authority developed the first two berths at the Jaya Container Terminal (JCT) and reached a prominent position in 1988, but the delay in further expansion over nearly five years caused volume stagnation near 0.6 million TEUs. When the next two berths were completed by 1997, the container volume rose to 1.7 million TEUs, near a 3-fold increase. Capacity addition did not happen for the next 5 years and performance stagnated at nearly 1.7 million TEUs. Container traffic was moving out to other ports during this delay. New Omani port of Salalah opened and the SeaLand line moved there from Colombo. Colombo was losing traffic gradually to Singapore, Dubai and Salalah. Lloyds List reported in 1998 that All is not well with the Port of Colombo and fights to retain container traffic.

South Asia Gateway Terminals (SAGT) came in as a private operator from 2002, and the container volume in Colombo raised to nearly 3.5 million TEUs, but stagnated again without any signs of capacity enhancement. Cochin Port Trust was developing Vallarpadam International Container Terminal, and announced that Colombo transshipment hub has to run for its money. According to reports they were offering discounts and incentives to lure international shipping lines.

The Ports Authority embarked on the new South Harbor breakwater in 2008 completing it by 2012. In the meantime the first container terminal in this South Harbor came into operation as Colombo International Container Terminals (CICT), thereby adding capacity and reaching actual performance at 7.05 million TEUs in 2018 and 7.228 million TEUs in 2019.

Again the Colombo Port is running out of container capacity, as there is no expansion after CICT. In spite of the Corona pandemic, temporarily affecting cargo throughput, it appears that 2020 volume would reach 7 million TEUs and a rapid rise is possible. Keeping in mind the lead time needed for capacity addition as stated above, and to eliminate any risk of losing traffic, timely action is critical.

 

Action Required now

Those in the shipping industry and the Ports Authority know that enhancing the container handling capacity addition in Colombo is long overdue. It will take two to three years for the ECT to help achieve this target after the green light is given. However, the ECT section which has already been constructed and equipped with three container handling cranes can be operationalised soon. Due to the delay in ECT operation, the Colombo Port faces the danger of losing cargo volumes and global position in terms of connectivity. Colombo should not lose its transshipment hub status in the region due to delays in its expansion. Prompt action is therefore essential for operationalisation of the ECT as the second deep water container terminal.


Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Islamophobia and the threat to democratic development

Published

on

There’s an ill more dangerous and pervasive than the Coronavirus that’s currently sweeping Sri Lanka. That is the fear to express one’s convictions. Across the public sector of the country in particular many persons holding high office are stringently regulating and controlling the voices of their consciences and this bodes ill for all and the country.

The corrupting impact of fear was discussed in this column a couple of weeks ago when dealing with the military coup in Myanmar. It stands to the enduring credit of ousted Myanmarese Head of Government Aung San Suu Kyi that she, perhaps for the first time in the history of modern political thought, singled out fear, and not power, as the principal cause of corruption within the individual; powerful or otherwise.

To be sure, power corrupts but the corrupting impact of fear is graver and more devastating. For instance, the fear in a person holding ministerial office or in a senior public sector official, that he would lose position and power as a result of speaking out his convictions and sincere beliefs on matters of the first importance, would lead to a country’s ills going unaddressed and uncorrected.

Besides, the individual concerned would be devaluing himself in the eyes of all irrevocably and revealing himself to be a person who would be willing to compromise his moral integrity for petty worldly gain or a ‘mess of pottage’. This happens all the while in Lankan public life. Some of those who have wielded and are wielding immense power in Sri Lanka leave very much to be desired from these standards.

It could be said that fear has prevented Sri Lanka from growing in every vital respect over the decades and has earned for itself the notoriety of being a directionless country.

All these ills and more are contained in the current controversy in Sri Lanka over the disposal of the bodies of Covid victims, for example. The Sri Lankan polity has no choice but to abide by scientific advice on this question. Since authorities of the standing of even the WHO have declared that the burial of the bodies of those dying of Covid could not prove to be injurious to the wider public, the Sri Lankan health authorities could go ahead and sanction the burying of the bodies concerned. What’s preventing the local authorities from taking this course since they claim to be on the side of science? Who or what are they fearing? This is the issue that’s crying out to be probed and answered.

Considering the need for absolute truthfulness and honesty on the part of all relevant persons and quarters in matters such as these, the latter have no choice but to resign from their positions if they are prevented from following the dictates of their consciences. If they are firmly convinced that burials could bring no harm, they are obliged to take up the position that burials should be allowed.

If any ‘higher authority’ is preventing them from allowing burials, our ministers and officials are conscience-bound to renounce their positions in protest, rather than behave compromisingly and engage in ‘double think’ and ‘double talk’. By adopting the latter course they are helping none but keeping the country in a state of chronic uncertainty, which is a handy recipe for social instabiliy and division.

In the Sri Lankan context, the failure on the part of the quarters that matter to follow scientific advice on the burials question could result in the aggravation of Islamophobia, or hatred of the practitioners of Islam, in the country. Sri Lanka could do without this latter phobia and hatred on account of its implications for national stability and development. The 30 year war against separatist forces was all about the prevention by military means of ‘nation-breaking’. The disastrous results for Sri Lanka from this war are continuing to weigh it down and are part of the international offensive against Sri Lanka in the UNHCR.

However, Islamophobia is an almost world wide phenomenon. It was greatly strengthened during Donald Trump’s presidential tenure in the US. While in office Trump resorted to the divisive ruling strategy of quite a few populist authoritarian rulers of the South. Essentially, the manoeuvre is to divide and rule by pandering to the racial prejudices of majority communities.

It has happened continually in Sri Lanka. In the initial post-independence years and for several decades after, it was a case of some populist politicians of the South whipping-up anti-Tamil sentiments. Some Tamil politicians did likewise in respect of the majority community. No doubt, both such quarters have done Sri Lanka immeasurable harm. By failing to follow scientific advice on the burial question and by not doing what is right, Sri Lanka’s current authorities are opening themselves to the charge that they are pandering to religious extremists among the majority community.

The murderous, destructive course of action adopted by some extremist sections among Muslim communities world wide, including of course Sri Lanka, has not earned the condemnation it deserves from moderate Muslims who make-up the preponderant majority in the Muslim community. It is up to moderate opinion in the latter collectivity to come out more strongly and persuasively against religious extremists in their midst. It will prove to have a cementing and unifying impact among communities.

It is not sufficiently appreciated by governments in the global South in particular that by voicing for religious and racial unity and by working consistently towards it, they would be strengthening democratic development, which is an essential condition for a country’s growth in all senses.

A ‘divided house’ is doomed to fall; this is the lesson of history. ‘National security’ cannot be had without human security and peaceful living among communities is central to the latter. There cannot be any ‘double talk’ or ‘politically correct’ opinions on this question. Truth and falsehood are the only valid categories of thought and speech.

Those in authority everywhere claiming to be democratic need to adopt a scientific outlook on this issue as well. Studies conducted on plural societies in South Asia, for example, reveal that the promotion of friendly, cordial ties among communities invariably brings about healing among estranged groups and produces social peace. This is the truth that is waiting to be acted upon.

Continue Reading

Features

Pakistan’s love of Sri Lanka

Published

on

By Sanjeewa Jayaweera

It was on 3rd January 1972 that our family arrived in Karachi from Moscow. Our departure from Moscow had been delayed for a few weeks due to the military confrontation between Pakistan and India. It ended on 16th December 1971. After that, international flights were not permitted for some time.

The contrast between Moscow and Karachi was unbelievable. First and foremost, Moscow’s temperature was near minus 40 degrees centigrade, while in Karachi, it was sunny and a warm 28 degrees centigrade. However, what struck us most was the extreme warmth with which the airport authorities greeted our family. As my father was a diplomat, we were quickly ushered to the airport’s VIP Lounge. We were in transit on our way to Rawalpindi, the airport serving the capital of Islamabad.

We quickly realized that the word “we are from Sri Lanka” opened all doors just as saying “open sesame” gained entry to Aladdin’s cave! The broad smile, extreme courtesy, and genuine warmth we received from the Pakistani people were unbelievable.

This was all to do with Mrs Sirima Bandaranaike’s decision to allow Pakistani aircraft to land in Colombo to refuel on the way to Dhaka in East Pakistan during the military confrontation between Pakistan and India. It was a brave decision by Mrs Bandaranaike (Mrs B), and the successive governments and Sri Lanka people are still enjoying the fruits of it. Pakistan has been a steadfast and loyal supporter of our country. They have come to our assistance time and again in times of great need when many have turned their back on us. They have indeed been an “all-weather” friend of our country.

Getting back to 1972, I was an early beneficiary of Pakistani people’s love for Sri Lankans. I failed the entrance exam to gain entry to the only English medium school in Islamabad! However, when I met the Principal, along with my father, he said, “Sanjeewa, although you failed the entrance exam, I will this time make an exception as Sri Lankans are our dear friends.” After that, the joke around the family dinner table was that I owed my education in Pakistan to Mrs B!

At school, my brother and I were extended a warm welcome and always greeted “our good friends from Sri Lanka.” I felt when playing cricket for our college; our runs were cheered more loudly than of others.

One particular incident that I remember well was when the Embassy received a telex from the Foreign inistry. It requested that our High Commissioner seek an immediate meeting with the Prime Minister of Pakistan, Mr Zulifikar Ali Bhutto (ZB), and convey a message from Mrs B. The message requested that an urgent shipment of rice be dispatched to Sri Lanka as there would be an imminent rice shortage. As the Ambassador was not in the station, the responsibility devolved on my father.

It usually takes about a week or more to get an audience with the Prime Minister (PM) of a foreign country due to their busy schedule. However, given the urgency, my father spoke to the Foreign Ministry’s Permanent Sectary, who fortunately was our neighbour and sought an urgent appointment. My father received a call from the PM’s secretary around 10 P.M asking him to come over to the PM’s residence. My father met ZB around midnight. ZB was about to retire to bed and, as such, was in his pyjamas and gown enjoying a cigar! He had greeted my father and had asked, “Mr Jayaweera, what can we do for great friend Madam Bandaranaike?. My father conveyed the message from Colombo and quietly mentioned that there would be riots in the country if there is no rice!

ZB had immediately got the Food Commissioner of Pakistan on the line and said, “I want a shipload of rice to be in Colombo within the next 72 hours!” The Food Commissioner reverted within a few minutes, saying that nothing was available and the last export shipment had left the port only a few hours ago to another country. ZB had instructed to turn the ship around and send it to Colombo. This despite protests from the Food Commissioner about terms and conditions of the Letter of Credit prohibiting non-delivery. Sri Lanka got its delivery of rice!

The next was the visit of Mrs B to Pakistan. On arrival in Rawalpindi airport, she was given a hero’s welcome, which Pakistan had previously only offered to President Gaddafi of Libya, who financially backed Pakistan with his oil money. That day, I missed school and accompanied my parents to the airport. On our way, we witnessed thousands of people had gathered by the roadside to welcome Mrs B.

When we walked to the airport’s tarmac, thousands of people were standing in temporary stands waving Sri Lanka and Pakistan flags and chanting “Sri Lanka Pakistan Zindabad.” The noise emanating from the crowd was as loud and passionate as the cheering that the Pakistani cricket team received during a test match. It was electric!

I believe she was only the second head of state given the privilege of addressing both assemblies of Parliament. The other being Gaddafi. There was genuine affection from Mrs B amongst the people of Pakistan.

I always remember the indefatigable efforts of Mr Abdul Haffez Kardar, a cabinet minister and the President of the Pakistan Cricket Board. From around 1973 onwards, he passionately championed Sri Lanka’s cause to be admitted as a full member of the International Cricket Council (ICC) and granted test status. Every year, he would propose at the ICC’s annual meeting, but England and Australia’s veto kept us out until 1981.

I always felt that our Cricket Board made a mistake by not inviting Pakistan to play our inaugural test match. We should have appreciated Mr Kardar and Pakistan’s efforts. In 1974 the Pakistan board invited our team for a tour involving three test matches and a few first-class games. Most of those who played in our first test match was part of that tour, and no doubt gained significant exposure playing against a highly talented Pakistani team.

Several Pakistani greats were part of the Pakistan and India team that played a match soon after the Central Bank bomb in Colombo to prove that it was safe to play cricket in Colombo. It was a magnificent gesture by both Pakistan and India. Our greatest cricket triumph was in Pakistan when we won the World Cup in 1996. I am sure the players and those who watched the match on TV will remember the passionate support our team received that night from the Pakistani crowd. It was like playing at home!

I also recall reading about how the Pakistani government air freighted several Multi Barrell artillery guns and ammunition to Sri Lanka when the A rmy camp in Jaffna was under severe threat from the LTTE. This was even more important than the shipload of rice that ZB sent. This was crucial as most other countries refused to sell arms to our country during the war.

Time and again, Pakistan has steadfastly supported our country’s cause at the UNHCR. No doubt this year, too, their diplomats will work tirelessly to assist our country.

We extend a warm welcome to Mr Imran Khan, the Prime Minister of Pakistan. He is a truly inspirational individual who was undoubtedly an excellent cricketer. Since retirement from cricket, he has decided to get involved in politics, and after several years of patiently building up his support base, he won the last parliamentary elections. I hope that just as much as he galvanized Sri Lankan cricketers, his political journey would act as a catalyst for people like Kumar Sangakkara and Mahela Jayawardene to get involved in politics. Cricket has been called a “gentleman’s game.” Whilst politics is far from it!.

Continue Reading

Features

Covid-19 health rules disregarded at entertainment venues?

Published

on

Believe me, seeing certain videos, on social media, depicting action, on the dance floor, at some of these entertainment venues, got me wondering whether this Coronavirus pandemic is REAL!

To those having a good time, at these particular venues, and, I guess, the management, as well, what the world is experiencing now doesn’t seem to be their concerned.

Obviously, such irresponsible behaviour could create more problems for those who are battling to halt the spread of Covid-19, and the new viriant of Covid, in our part of the world.

The videos, on display, on social media, show certain venues, packed to capacity – with hardly anyone wearing a mask, and social distancing…only a dream..

How can one think of social distancing while gyrating, on a dance floor, that is over crowded!

If this trend continues, it wouldn’t be a surprise if Coronavirus makes its presence felt…at such venues.

And, then, what happens to the entertainment scene, and those involved in this field, especially the musicians? No work, whatsoever!

Lots of countries have closed nightclubs, and venues, where people gather, in order to curtail the spread of this deadly virus that has already claimed the lives of thousands.

Thailand did it and the country is still having lots of restrictions, where entertainment is concerned, and that is probably the reason why Thailand has been able to control the spread of the Coronavirus.

With a population of over 69 million, they have had (so far), a little over 25,000 cases, and 83 deaths, while we, with a population of around 21 million, have over 80,000 cases, and more than 450 deaths.

I’m not saying we should do away with entertainment – totally – but we need to follow a format, connected with the ‘new normal,’ where masks and social distancing are mandatory requirements at these venues. And, dancing, I believe, should be banned, at least temporarily, as one can’t maintain the required social distance, while on the dance floor, especially after drinks.

Police spokesman DIG Ajith Rohana keeps emphasising, on TV, radio, and in the newspapers, the need to adhere to the health regulations, now in force, and that those who fail to do so would be penalised.

He has also stated that plainclothes officers would move around to apprehend such offenders.

Perhaps, he should instruct his officers to pay surprise visits to some of these entertainment venues.

He would certainly have more than a bus load of offenders to be whisked off for PCR/Rapid Antigen tests!

I need to quote what Dr. H.T. Wickremasinghe said in his article, published in The Island of Tuesday, February 16th, 2021:

“…let me conclude, while emphasising the need to continue our general public health measures, such as wearing masks, social distancing, and avoiding crowded gatherings, to reduce the risk of contact with an infected person.

“There is no science to beat common sense.”

But…do some of our folks have this thing called COMMON SENSE!

Continue Reading